Liberation Theology argues that wealth disparity is inherently sinful ("structural sin") and that justice requires the forceful redistribution of property from the "oppressor" class to the "oppressed."
The Bible explicitly forbids desiring what belongs to another. A political theology built on mobilizing envy to seize property is a direct violation of the Decalogue.
Furthermore, the New Testament reinforces that if a man will not work, he shall not eat (2 Thess 3:10), rejecting the idea of entitlement to another's labor.
This doctrine states that God sides with the poor in class struggle, and therefore the church and the law must show bias in favor of the poor against the rich.
Biblical justice is blind. God demands that judgment be rendered according to truth, not according to the economic status of the participants. Showing partiality to the poor is just as sinful as showing partiality to the rich.
Marxist analysis demands a binary framework where the owner of capital is necessarily exploiting the worker. The "Master" is always the villain.
Jesus frequently used masters and property owners in parables to represent God the Father. In the Parable of the Talents, the "Master" judges his servants based on their stewardship and merit. The servant who was lazy and hid his talent was condemned, while the productive servants were rewarded.
Liberation Theology immanentizes the eschaton, believing that the Kingdom of God is achieved through political overturning of earthly power structures.
Jesus explicitly rejected the role of a political revolutionary. His Kingdom is spiritual, not a geopolitical entity established through violence or social action.